Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754183AbZGVRw7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:52:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754009AbZGVRw7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:52:59 -0400 Received: from tac.ki.iif.hu ([193.6.222.43]:41057 "EHLO tac.ki.iif.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753061AbZGVRw6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:52:58 -0400 From: Ferenc Wagner To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ray Lee , Andrew Morton , Peter Staubach , Miklos Szeredi , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mmap vs mtime in 2.6.26 and up References: <20090518114305.GA6303@infradead.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:52:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20090518114305.GA6303@infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Mon, 18 May 2009 07:43:05 -0400") Message-ID: <87ab2w8v1y.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1490 Lines: 36 Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:50:54PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 06:40:29PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >>> Thanks for the analysis. Unfortunately I don't nearly know enough to >>> work on this issue, but would like to track it as it affects our >>> backup system. So, shouldn't #2645 be reopened again? >> >> Yes, definitively as the current "fix" is incorrected. I'll try to cook >> up a correct version once I get some time. > > Doing this correctly in the framework of the current codee is > unfortunately not so easy, as calling ->setattr requires taking i_mutex > which we can't in the pagefaul path. > > To fix this properly we need to actually update the timestamps during > msync and co as done by the patches from Miklos: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/28/166 > and Peter: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/31/176 Hi Christoph, http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645#c53 shows that Anton doesn't quite agree with you on this. I really can't tell, would you (or anybody from the accused XFS community) please comment? Or did you perhaps fix it meanwhile? I can't easily test never kernels, but I will if there's some chance. -- Thanks, Feri. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/