Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754397AbZGWQWI (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:22:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752462AbZGWQWH (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:22:07 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:60790 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752440AbZGWQWH (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:22:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:18:06 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Roland McGrath Cc: Andrew Morton , Hiroshi Shimamoto , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] move binfmt filed to signal_struct Message-ID: <20090723161806.GA5690@redhat.com> References: <4A56FEF7.80207@ct.jp.nec.com> <20090722132302.a9889eb3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090722220353.88B2A67B6E@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090722220353.88B2A67B6E@magilla.sf.frob.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 547 Lines: 20 On 07/22, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > > Because the binfmt is not different between threads in the same process, > > > it can be moved from task_struct to signal_struct. > > > > Seems like a logical cleanup to me. > > IMHO binfmt belongs in mm_struct. Ah, agreed. Hiroshi, what do you think? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/