Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751582AbZGXA0L (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:26:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751288AbZGXA0K (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:26:10 -0400 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:38920 "EHLO tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750869AbZGXA0K (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:26:10 -0400 Message-ID: <4A68FD3B.7040606@ct.jp.nec.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:15:55 +0900 From: Hiroshi Shimamoto User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oleg Nesterov CC: Roland McGrath , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] move binfmt filed to signal_struct References: <4A56FEF7.80207@ct.jp.nec.com> <20090722132302.a9889eb3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090722220353.88B2A67B6E@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20090723161806.GA5690@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20090723161806.GA5690@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 623 Lines: 20 Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 07/22, Roland McGrath wrote: >>>> Because the binfmt is not different between threads in the same process, >>>> it can be moved from task_struct to signal_struct. >>> Seems like a logical cleanup to me. >> IMHO binfmt belongs in mm_struct. > > Ah, agreed. > > Hiroshi, what do you think? yeah, it sounds better. I'll try to update. Thanks, Hiroshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/