Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S310585AbSCMNun>; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:50:43 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S310591AbSCMNud>; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:50:33 -0500
Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:27142 "HELO
	netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S310585AbSCMNuW>;
	Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:50:22 -0500
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:50:05 -0300 (BRT)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Kernel Panic on 2.5.6 and 2.5.7-pre1 boot [PATCH] and
 discussion of Linux testing procedures
In-Reply-To: <200203131002.g2DA2Mm19938@bitshadow.namesys.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0203131048490.2181-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org
X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Hans Reiser wrote:

> I would encourage requiring that every patch sent to Linus have two
> signatures on it, one indicating that the author has tested it and
> another indicating what second person has tested it.

Agreed. Linus and Marcelo are very busy and shouldn't be
bothered with untested patches.  If we only send them
known-good stuff their lives should get a little bit
easier.

regards,

Rik
-- 
<insert bitkeeper endorsement here>

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/