Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:30:30 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C9ric?= Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Cc: webmaster@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.27.28
Message-ID: <20090725033030.GA481@suse.de>
References: <20090724222746.GA30562@kroah.com>
 <4A6A48A1.80608@tremplin-utc.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4A6A48A1.80608@tremplin-utc.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 822
Lines: 20

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 01:49:53AM +0200, ?ric Piel wrote:
> Currently, there is no clue on www.kernel.org that 2.6.27 is a "long
> term stable" kernel tree. Would it be possible to add a line to the page
> pointing to the latest version of this type of tree? I'm sure some
> people would love discovering that such thing exists :-)

I'm curious as to why someone, if they were inclined to be using such a
thing, wouldn't already know about this?

How many people really are relying on this .27 branch, becides the
distros, these days?  And if you are, why?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/