Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752263AbZGYTKo (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:10:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752148AbZGYTKn (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:10:43 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f184.google.com ([209.85.216.184]:40068 "EHLO mail-px0-f184.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752135AbZGYTKm (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:10:42 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=sOV3PqvkgJPicjheVGWmjoc9l1r6QoE0ibBwK7EeLMmcMZ63xMJbH4WiEmBbIgIXRo G7lYRnKH9YWSCj++48rzuafdJf7zACW+HdxyMjHrf/YSLSaMbI+jgX7cUZHirLeXszcS ZnJnJkknqsfpecDarVF2CKVgSBD0Ep5LclSEM= Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:10:37 -0700 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Frans Pop Cc: Manuel Lauss , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Manuel Lauss , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion Message-ID: <20090725191037.GE14062@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> References: <1248275919-3296-1-git-send-email-manuel.lauss@gmail.com> <20090725174449.GC14062@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> <200907252019.01266.elendil@planet.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200907252019.01266.elendil@planet.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 971 Lines: 27 On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 08:18:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 25 July 2009, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:18:39PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote: > > > Cc: Frans Pop > > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss > > > > > > + > > > +static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = { > > > + .resume = au1xmmc_resume, > > > + .suspend = au1xmmc_suspend, > > > +}; > > > + > > > > Was suspend to disk tested? It requires freeze()/thaw(). > > Is that a regression introduced by this patch then? If so, many more of > the recent dev_pm_ops conversion patches would need to be revisited. Yes, as far as I understand they would. Let's ask Rafael to confirm... -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/