Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:46:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:46:24 -0500 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:30483 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:46:13 -0500 Message-ID: <3C8F9E73.6000200@namesys.com> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:46:11 +0300 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020310 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Viro CC: Martin Dalecki , Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Kernel Panic on 2.5.6 and 2.5.7-pre1 boot [PATCH] and discussion of Linux testing procedures In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Viro wrote: > > >Proposal is a bit naive, though - in most of the cases fuckups merrily >pass original testing. > > > No, I think we catch 70-85%. Namesys internal bad patches frequently pass original testing of patch author and are caught by professional tester whose specialty is testing reiserfs patches. You just haven't seen these bad patches, so you don't realize how effective the catching is.;-) There have been a lot of catches.;-) It is not simply a matter of skill in testing though: you need a second person to test it in the way that the author did not think to test it (e.g. by booting to the right kernel, everyone on this list has made that benchmarking/testing error a few times, yes....;-) ). Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/