Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752745AbZG0QBF (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:01:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751908AbZG0QBF (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:01:05 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f198.google.com ([209.85.210.198]:53758 "EHLO mail-yx0-f198.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751387AbZG0QBE (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:01:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=l5dn4o7F2MyyzGhezuRT6pOhkGlw6ZK8h38ZroDlltcEFaq586HLWzb+PUfFQ3aBKD U5ZXCsb94NEumdAvI1FmJ2b8vbDhRukT7AM7jd2CwcB5okwiB8Bwm+Tp01Ihf8gfQlvz vyuaj0Tm8L9Th2o2PSXCejCsSGwlvzeoE3R8c= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090727140039.GC13577@bo.mcbone.net> References: <1248681637.7279.12.camel@fnki-nb00130> <1248694266.6987.1594.camel@twins> <1248697004.7279.31.camel@fnki-nb00130> <1248697409.6987.1617.camel@twins> <1248698755.7279.47.camel@fnki-nb00130> <1248701812.6987.1637.camel@twins> <20090727140039.GC13577@bo.mcbone.net> From: Ray Lee Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:00:44 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dca328c39fc74be7 Message-ID: <2c0942db0907270900uef8f32ao72319090d816d3c4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: futexes: Still infinite loop in get_futex_key() in 2.6.31-rc4 To: Jens Rosenboom Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Sonny Rao , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 964 Lines: 23 On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Jens Rosenboom wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:36:52PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 14:45 +0200, Jens Rosenboom wrote: > > > > > Good question, but as this happens on a production machine, I cannot > > > easily change the installation to check this. > > > > Uhm, but you do run .31-rc4 on it? :-) > > In the hope of verifying a patch, yes. Before that we had 2.6.29.4 > for some time. In principle you should be able to run an x86_64 kernel on that machine with the 32-bit userspace unchanged. The only hassle would be if you are using any kernel modules outside the normal tree. So, no need to change the full installation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/