Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752014AbZG1CXT (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:23:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751611AbZG1CXT (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:23:19 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:39932 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751387AbZG1CXS (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:23:18 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add walltime support for ring-buffer Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Steven Rostedt , Zhaolei , Ingo Molnar , LKML In-Reply-To: <20090728015351.GF5147@nowhere> References: <20090728103227.D7FB.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090728015351.GF5147@nowhere> Message-Id: <20090728105931.D801.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:23:15 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2105 Lines: 56 > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:43:11AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > Hi Zhaolei, > > > > > Hi Zhaolei, > > > > > > Could you not just save the wall time in some 64bit format within the > > > current timestamp? Right now there's three clocks that can be used by > > > ftrace. Two that you can really get two (I need to add access to the > > > third). The default clock is sched_clock. But there's an option to get to > > > global_clock: > > > > > > debug/tracing/options/global-clock > > > > > > # echo 1 > /debug/tracing/options/global-clock > > > > > > Will enable the global clock. Perhaps we can add a "wall clock" version > > > that will map the timestamps to the wall clock? > > > > > > I really hate adding any more fields to the ring buffer headers. That > > > takes away from the amount that you can record per page. > > > > I think wall-time recording on every event is too slow. slower tracer > > isn't useful. > > Instead, Can we make pseudo wall-time recording event periodically? > > > > In nowadays, many workload run on cluster machine environment. Then > > We often need compare different machines tracing log. it mean TSC isn't > > sufficient. but nobody want performance reduce. > > Fortunatelly, ntp time adjustment is not happend so frequently. we > > don't need wall-time on _every_ event. > > > > Thanks. > > > Yeah, that would really slow the tracing. > > Can't we get a snapshot of the couple (walltime, cpu clock) once > at startup. > Then we can retrieve the walltime when cpu_clock was 0 and compute > the walltime for each traces at output time using the trace timestamp as > a delta? It can. but I don't think it is sufficient. On flight recorder use-case, The tracing run more than one year. And, Administrator only see last N sec log. (previous logs were overwritten by ring-buffer go-around) Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/