Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S311121AbSCMVVS>; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:21:18 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S311378AbSCMVVI>; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:21:08 -0500
Received: from nydalah028.sn.umu.se ([130.239.118.227]:56716 "EHLO
	x-files.giron.wox.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S311121AbSCMVUv>; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 16:20:51 -0500
Message-ID: <002b01c1cad4$f06ce370$0201a8c0@homer>
From: "Martin Eriksson" <nitrax@giron.wox.org>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: HPT370 RAID-1 or Software RAID-1, what's "best"?
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:20:45 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

What is "best" on Linux 2.4.X (with any appropriate patches) ?

HPT370 RAID-1 or Software RAID-1 ?

And if Software RAID-1 is best of these two, where is it most stable; on an
i815 chipset, a VIA chipset (686B) or on a promise controller?

I define "best" as:
* most stable
* least complex setup
* least hassle when something goes wrong

 _____________________________________________________
|  Martin Eriksson <nitrax@giron.wox.org>
|  MSc CSE student, department of Computing Science
|  Ume? University, Sweden


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/