Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753101AbZG1TuK (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:50:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750848AbZG1TuJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:50:09 -0400 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:47884 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750819AbZG1TuJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:50:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4A6F5670.4010405@goop.org> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:50:08 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesse Barnes CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , the arch/x86 maintainers , Stefan Assmann Subject: drivers/pci/quirks.c: irq_reroute_variant is dead code? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 659 Lines: 15 quirk_reroute_to_boot_interrupts_intel() goes to some effort to scan for a bunch of Intel devices and set dev->irq_reroute_variant = INTEL_IRQ_REROUTE_VARIANT. However, as far as I can see that's the only reference to dev->irq_reroute_variant and INTEL_IRQ_REROUTE_VARIANT, so the whole thing appears to have no effect. Is it all dead code? Is there something else which should be there missing? Thanks, J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/