Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 00:48:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 00:47:59 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:3589 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 00:47:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 01:41:40 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Andre Hedrick Cc: Jens Axboe , Karsten Weiss , lkml Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.19-pre3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > Jens, > > Please try again because that is not the real problem. > All you have shown is that we disagree on the method of page walking > between BLOCK v/s IOCTL. This is very minor and I agreed that it is > reasonable to map the IOCTL buffer in to BH or BIO so this is a net zero > of negative point. > > How about attempting to describe the differences between the atomic and > what is violated by who and where. Andre, Jens just described what can be violated: "First of all, rq->buffer cannot be indexed for the entire nr_sectors range -- it's per definition only the first segment in the request, and can as such only be indexed within the first current_nr_sectors number of sectors. The above can be grossly out of range..." Can you tell me why his is wrong ? BTW, I just checked 2.5 and it seems to be the similar (on the non-BIO case). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/