Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 19:21:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 19:21:23 -0500 Received: from [66.30.136.189] ([66.30.136.189]:12417 "HELO kullstam.ne.mediaone.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 19:21:10 -0500 From: "Johan Kullstam" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: multiprocessor kernel problem In-Reply-To: <20001204052123.CE84281F0@halfway.linuxcare.com.au> Organization: none Date: 04 Dec 2000 18:53:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: Rusty Russell's message of "Mon, 04 Dec 2000 16:21:13 +1100" Message-ID: Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rusty Russell writes: > In message you write: > > yes, but is it a dual machine or is it an N-way SMP with N > 2? the > > other guy with iptables/SMP problems also has a quad box. could this > > perhaps be a problem only when you have more than two processors? > > Yes, hacked my machine to think it had 4 cpus, and boom. > > There are two problems: > (1) initialization of multiple tables was wrong, and > (2) iterating through tables should not use cpu_number_map (doesn't > matter on X86 though). > > Please try attached patch. ok i'll give this a whirl .... success! netfilter/iptables seems to be up and working on my quad ppro box now. i am running your "quick guide to firewalling" from the howto until i get my rules straightened out. thank you very much. johan -- J o h a n K u l l s t a m [kullstam@ne.mediaone.net] Don't Fear the Penguin! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/