Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752579AbZG2SJw (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:09:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751045AbZG2SJv (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:09:51 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f228.google.com ([209.85.220.228]:35053 "EHLO mail-fx0-f228.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750794AbZG2SJu (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:09:50 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=sJomHwAZ7i79vRMEnkUdyHHvJ0gHrWN/rIMW0zejkX/8nFuOxw3RppZ7RCO8D22wRd 2m494js+QV47kFOoNACdTGPxUW5u/VfrERang7Gb6CRE3DtERDf8HHxOTkb2LK3VW/Pu F6XTBylV26hUL5YGc0bop//hnKfqNCph8DK34= Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:02:44 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [x86, msr]: execute on the correct CPU subset Message-ID: <20090729180244.GA28534@liondog.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1246890592-12256-1-git-send-email-borislav.petkov@amd.com> <4A526D38.7000803@zytor.com> <20090707103723.GD5668@aftab> <4A537010.3050905@zytor.com> <20090708111911.GC19315@aftab> <4A6E1222.5010709@zytor.com> <20090729164941.GA9388@aftab> <4A708745.5040203@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A708745.5040203@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 844 Lines: 25 On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:30:45AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 07/29/2009 09:49 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 01:46:26PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> Any reason not to use get_cpu() ... put_cpu() instead? > > > > In case you haven't applied the one from yesterday yet, here's a better > > one which uses struct cpumask * instead of cpumask_t. > > > > Mangled patch (quoted-printable). Sorry about that, will resend tomorrow. > Furthermore, are there any users for this interface at this time? Yep, drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/