Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754115AbZG2T2P (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:28:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753356AbZG2T2O (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:28:14 -0400 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:32952 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752869AbZG2T2O (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:28:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:28:14 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, fweisbec@gmail.com, Ingo Molnar , benh@kernel.crashing.org, anton@samba.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] basic perf support for sparc Message-ID: <20090729192814.GT4148@kernel.dk> References: <20090729112509.GN4148@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090729112509.GN4148@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 632 Lines: 17 On Wed, Jul 29 2009, Jens Axboe wrote: > Building the perf tool is somewhat involved on sparc64 > though, since 64-bit versions of zlib/libelf/bfd aren't > directly available (at least on debian 5.x). But once you > get there, it runs :-). Would it be easier/functional > to build 32-bit userland perf instead? Same is true on ppc64, btw. How are others handling this? -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/