Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754911AbZG3AhA (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:37:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754192AbZG3Ag7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:36:59 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:51465 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754171AbZG3Ag7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:36:59 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:36:58 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Andrew Morton Cc: Catalin Marinas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: Possible memory leak via alloc_pid() Message-ID: <20090730003658.GA27040@us.ibm.com> References: <20090729170315.f62066c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090729170315.f62066c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2096 Lines: 55 Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org): > On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:33:31 +0100 > Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > There's a kmemleak report of a struct pid allocation in alloc_pid() > > which somehow gets lost: > > > > unreferenced object 0xc307aa00 (size 44): > > comm "gdm", pid 2734, jiffies 4294902040 > > backtrace: > > [] create_object+0xfa/0x250 > > [] kmemleak_alloc+0x5d/0x70 > > [] kmem_cache_alloc+0x156/0x1a0 > > [] alloc_pid+0x19/0x350 > > [] copy_process+0x800/0x1230 > > [] do_fork+0x6f/0x370 > > [] sys_clone+0x36/0x40 > > [] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38 > > [] 0xffffffff > > > > This is the gdm fork for starting Xorg (with pid 2739). It first > > logged me in automatically, after which I logged out and gdm started > > another Xorg. The pid structure for the first Xorg is reported as a > > leak. The Xorg with pid 2739 is no longer present on my system. > > > > Using gdb vmlinux /proc/kcore shows that the pid->count is 2, so > > that's why it probably wasn't freed by put_pid(): > > > > (gdb) print ({struct pid}0xc307aa00) > > $20 = {count = {counter = 2}, level = 0, tasks = {{first = 0x0}, { > > first = 0x0}, {first = 0x0}}, rcu = {next = 0xc24bfd64, > > func = 0xc0154e90 }, numbers = {{nr = 2739, > > ns = 0xc0737540, pid_chain = {next = 0x0, pprev = 0x200200}}}} > > > > Note that kmemleak is aware of and scans pid_hash (which was recorded > > in kmemleak as a 16KB object). > > > > Thanks. Let's cc some recent pid fiddlers. Hi, thanks for the report. Note that kernel modules can increment those counds through find_get_pid(). Can you send your kernel .config and the output of lsmod? thanks, -serge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/