Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:04:56 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 00/12] clocksource / timekeeping rework V2
Message-ID: <20090730150456.6c87b997@skybase>
In-Reply-To: <1248958173.6046.32.camel@desktop>
References: <200907291717.n6THHG6f001426@d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
	<20090730125351.6f16e9ec@skybase>
	<1248958173.6046.32.camel@desktop>
Organization: IBM Corporation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1351
Lines: 32

On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:49:33 -0700
Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 12:53 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> 
> > > I'm not sure allowing that type of override a good idea tho .. I don't
> > > think it's considered a usable clock when the rating goes to zero.
> > 
> > Override as the root user -> your foot, no? The whole override stuff is
> > there for the case that the clocksource selection picked a broken clock
> > and you want to force the system into a semi-working state. Ideally the
> > whole override would go away, but that is probably wishful thinking..
> 
> I would agree if the system doesn't crash as a result, if it just starts
> to operate funny then that's maybe acceptable. If you keep the change
> rating function, you could potentially remove the unregister path..

Why shouldn't it be possible to have a clocksource as a module? I think
that the unregister path should stay. To really make it work we'd need
a function to force the system out of the one-shot mode though.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/