Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 20:32:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 20:32:17 -0500 Received: from [213.157.1.114] ([213.157.1.114]:24068 "EHLO server.dreamind") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 20:32:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 02:03:56 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Pfetzing To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Posible Bug at page_alloc.c in the [2.4.0-test11] kernel In-Reply-To: <20001205005159.12636.qmail@theseus.mathematik.uni-ulm.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Tue, 5 Dec 2000 schrieb ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de : > On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 01:04:05AM +0100, Stefan Pfetzing wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I think i possibly foun a Bug in the Linux Kernel 2.4.0-test11. > > I patched the kernel with the bttv driver 7.49 but nothing else. > > My system was up for 5 1/2 days and than it crashed. > > [ page_alloc: BUG at line 84 ] > > That's interesting. Could you double check that you run 2.4.0-test11 > and not 2.4.0-test12preX? There has been at least one reports of this > very bug and two others that look related. However, it looked like a > test12-pre[34] problem - until now. > no please believe me it IS 2.4.0-test11 uname -a: Linux server 2.4.0-test11 #3 Tue Nov 28 21:15:01 CET 2000 i586 unknow > > [ ... ] > > If i forgot anything (kernel config or anything else please mail me. > > The compiler version you are using is always an interesting data point. > But I doubt that this is the problem here. the gcc is version 2.95.2 > > Gruesse Christian > cu dreamind p.s.:please reply ALSO to my private address because I am NOT on the mailing-list. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/