Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751857AbZG3Q4A (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:56:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751480AbZG3Q4A (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:56:00 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71]:14202 "EHLO sj-iport-2.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751342AbZG3Qz7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:55:59 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAENtcUqrR7PE/2dsb2JhbAC7SognkCsFhBE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,296,1246838400"; d="scan'208";a="191257498" From: Roland Dreier To: lkml@MoreThan.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Uni-processor interrupt state preservation. References: <200907301137.22035.lkml@morethan.org> X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:55:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200907301137.22035.lkml@morethan.org> (Michael S. Zick's message of "Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:37:18 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2009 16:55:59.0181 (UTC) FILETIME=[9CE797D0:01CA1136] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 415 Lines: 10 > Just how is the interrupt state (in ebx) supposed to be preserved across > the function call? Doesn't the i386 ABI say that ebx is preserved across function calls? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/