Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751925AbZG3RCf (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:02:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751616AbZG3RCe (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:02:34 -0400 Received: from mx-out.daemonmail.net ([216.104.160.38]:47018 "EHLO mx-out.daemonmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751209AbZG3RCe (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:02:34 -0400 From: "Michael S. Zick" Reply-To: lkml@morethan.org To: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [RFC] Uni-processor interrupt state preservation. Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:01:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200907301137.22035.lkml@morethan.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907301201.12197.lkml@morethan.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 566 Lines: 18 On Thu July 30 2009, Roland Dreier wrote: > > > Just how is the interrupt state (in ebx) supposed to be preserved across > > the function call? > > Doesn't the i386 ABI say that ebx is preserved across function calls? > > If it does, then that is the answer to my question - Link to the ABI document please. Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/