Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751807AbZG3RJq (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:09:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751538AbZG3RJp (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:09:45 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:57040 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751370AbZG3RJo (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:09:44 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+OmG1oLRaOUHpq5lsLUCrQAGYVq+MdT7ODnIbhGk 3Ze/uVT4zQCbN+ Subject: Re: [wireless] rt2870sta BUGs on shutdown, 2.6.30.2->git.today+git.wireless.today From: Mike Galbraith To: Ivo van Doorn Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Luis Correia , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "John W. Linville" , Johannes Berg In-Reply-To: <200907301852.28172.IvDoorn@gmail.com> References: <1248945770.7910.24.camel@marge.simson.net> <200907301517.57811.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200907301852.28172.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:09:40 +0200 Message-Id: <1248973780.7091.10.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.59 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1851 Lines: 30 On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 18:52 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > I planned, and actually did write, a lengthy reply for this thread, when I completed the reply > I reconsidred and opted for this shorter reply. Every 2 or 3 months this discussion is started > again and I am f***ing tired of it, so excuse me but I am not going to throw myself into > this completely pointless discussion > > What you are suggesting in your mail is something the rt2x00 project did for 5 years, we stopped > with that 4 months ago because it wasn't working out. Apparently you have more experience in this > matter so I hope you will find a way to make that solution work out. > > If you want to maintain the legacy drivers then do it, start a new project and start maintaining > the code. I can forward you all the users with complains about the "good enough" drivers. It is > good to know that you apparently have the resources to maintain the old drivers. > Most people who are helping with the rt2800pci/usb drivers lack the required time to boost the driver > into such a state it can be widely adopted. But every time it amazes me that the people who want > to develop and have the time to do it, all want to jump on the old Ralink code... Apparently there > is some appeal to maintaining crap rather then helping to ship out proper drivers to the users. > > But I'll shut up now, as I said this discussion is held every few months, so perhaps that when > the discussion is started again in a couple of months I am more interested in a lengthy reply. Hohum. Please remove me from CC for any further discussion. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/