Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752932AbZG3WFX (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:05:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752038AbZG3WFV (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:05:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com ([209.85.219.214]:50324 "EHLO mail-ew0-f214.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751828AbZG3WFR (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:05:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=fgIloiIaHWzmb+A1dm24mzYY73pB70BOWQ5OvKIWhj6Tq9UU79w7+DGUF3lRDQkGTH VhbfWI0IEmE15B2DpclL1IECu4L/5YaPt8Logc0j5WEnz7cRCiu2Oe66k71uW7ypdmW5 EPcm+Vw3QCxg39/FjaTc6FkUK0oaXnbW+lrMc= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] acer-wmi: switch driver to dev_pm_ops From: Arnaud Faucher To: Carlos Corbacho Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dmitry Torokhov , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Frans Pop , Manuel Lauss , Erik Ekman , Mark Brown In-Reply-To: <1248908025.3998.15.camel@green> References: <1248527091-18246-1-git-send-email-arnaud.faucher@gmail.com> <1248648663.3718.7.camel@green> <1248824367.4112.31.camel@green> <200907292249.47761.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090729213756.D23EF526EC9@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> <1248908025.3998.15.camel@green> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:05:09 -0400 Message-Id: <1248991509.4901.9.camel@green> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.27.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 832 Lines: 21 On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 18:53 -0400, Arnaud Faucher wrote : > As of today, acer_platform_freeze() does not stop/reset any device, so, > I agree with Rafael that for acer-wmi, .thaw() can be skipped. I had > also tested this configuration and it was working like the non-patched > code. > > Carlos, do you think that any acer-specific hardware could be switched > off or reset inside acer_platform_freeze() ? If this was the case, we > would have to wire .thaw()... > Should I send a new patch with only .freeze() and .restore() wired ? --- Hope to see Cox and Torvalds reconcile... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/