Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:14:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:14:23 -0500 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:17139 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:14:14 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: To: Tigran Aivazian Cc: Alan Cox , Gerd Knorr , Marcelo Tosatti , Kernel List , arjan@fenrus.demon.nl Subject: Re: [patch] vmalloc_to_page() backport for 2.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:13:12 +0000 Message-ID: <25104.1016111592@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org tigran@veritas.com said: > And, as such, it suggests that the _GPL bit in the export clause is > not justified and should be removed. There is no reason whatsoever why > Linux base kernel should allow some useful functionality to GPL > modules and disallow the same to non-GPL ones. You offer no reason why the routine in question _should_ be exported for use by binary-only modules. EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() was invented to allow authors of code to make their intentions clear; if you disagree with the decision in this case then either take it up in private with the author of this code, or switch to BSD, which doesn't suffer from this pesky GPL-thingy. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/