Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:18:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:18:41 -0500 Received: from sun.fadata.bg ([80.72.64.67]:26377 "HELO fadata.bg") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:18:23 -0500 To: Anton Blanchard Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile In-Reply-To: <20020313085217.GA11658@krispykreme> <460695164.1016001894@[10.10.2.3]> <20020314112725.GA2008@krispykreme> X-No-CC: Reply to lists, not to me. From: Momchil Velikov In-Reply-To: <20020314112725.GA2008@krispykreme> Date: 14 Mar 2002 15:21:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87wuwfxp25.fsf@fadata.bg> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Anton" == Anton Blanchard writes: Anton> Thats due to the way we manipulate the ppc hashed page table. Every Anton> time we update the linux page tables we have to update the hashed Anton> page table. There are some obvious optimisations we need to make, Out of curiousity, why there's a need to update the linux page tables ? Doesn't pte/pmd/pgd family functions provide enough abstraction in order to maintain _only_ the hashed page table ? Regards, -velco - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/