Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:00:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:59:55 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:39941 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:59:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:59:12 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: "Richard B. Johnson" Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, Andrea Arcangeli , , , , Subject: Re: 2.4.19pre2aa1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > [SNIPPED rest of diatribe...] > > Listen you incompetent amoeba. Likewise. Lets go over this again: 1) the idea is to have a hashing function that performs well for the page cache and/or the hashed wait queues 2) input for these two hash functions is not at all guaranteed to be random or uniformly spread 3) this means we need a hash function that performs well on very much non-random inputs Now, where does your random number generator fit in this scenario ? regards, Rik -- http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/