Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:46:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:46:28 -0500 Received: from bay-bridge.veritas.com ([143.127.3.10]:31888 "EHLO svldns02.veritas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:46:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:46:39 +0000 (GMT) From: Hugh Dickins To: Alan Cox cc: Tigran Aivazian , kraxel@bytesex.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@fenrus.demon.nl Subject: Re: [patch] vmalloc_to_page() backport for 2.4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > Similarly the PAE/non-PAE thing is a red herring. Given that even basic > data types change size on pae no module is going to be magically pae/non-pae > clean if its binary only. Few modules take an interest in ptes, that's as it should be, and so few modules build to different binaries with CONFIX_X86_PAE off or on (modulo module versions). I love vmalloc_to_page because it takes pte dependence out of a group of modules which really had no interest in ptes in the first place. Less false grep hits when searching the tree! Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/