Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752267AbZIATQI (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:16:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751508AbZIATQH (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:16:07 -0400 Received: from ns1.ata-over-ethernet.org ([12.51.113.4]:42303 "EHLO coraid.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715AbZIATQG (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:16:06 -0400 From: Ed Cashin X-Mailer: nedmail Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:15:20 -0400 To: bonbons@linux-vserver.org, ecashin@coraid.com, apw@canonical.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] aoe: ensure we initialise the request_queue correctly Message-ID: <6309cc7d77486e24aca5130ec5802dfb@coraid.com> In-Reply-To: <20090829154305.723fd86c@neptune.home> References: <1250872904-10993-1-git-send-email-apw@canonical.com> <9ab0e087296715d764071d4d39542985@coraid.com> <20090829154305.723fd86c@neptune.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1574 Lines: 43 On Sat Aug 29 09:43:54 EDT 2009, bonbons@linux-vserver.org wrote: ... > I finished bisecting the NULL object and ended up at this commit: > cd43e26f071524647e660706b784ebcbefbd2e44 > > block: Expose stacked device queues in sysfs > > Currently stacking devices do not have a queue directory in sysfs. > However, many of the I/O characteristics like sector size, maximum > request size, etc. are queue properties. > > This patch enables the queue directory for MD/DM devices. The elevator > code has been modified to deal with queues that do not have an I/O > scheduler. > > Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe > > > This seems to generate /sys/block/$device/queue and its contents for > everyone who is using queues, not just for those queues that have a > non-NULL queue->request_fn. Thanks much for doing that. It makes sense that this change would have caused it to suddenly matter whether the unused queue is initialized. The patch looks fine to me. I don't think it should go in my aoe tree for linux-next, since the patch addresses a regression. Based on the series file in mmotm, I don't think this patch is in mm at the moment. Andrew Morton, do you think this patch should go through your mm tree? -- Ed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/