Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753665AbZIBWSo (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:18:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753628AbZIBWSn (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:18:43 -0400 Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:42276 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753610AbZIBWSj (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:18:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4A9EEF07.5070800@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:17:43 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zdenek Kabelac CC: Patrick McHardy , Christoph Lameter , Robin Holt , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Pekka Enberg , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Linux Netdev List , Netfilter Developers Subject: Re: System freeze on reboot - general protection fault References: <20090811154853.GF2763@sgi.com> <4A87CE60.4020506@gmail.com> <4A896324.3040104@trash.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (gw1.cosmosbay.com [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:17:45 +0200 (CEST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3224 Lines: 79 Zdenek Kabelac a ?crit : > 2009/8/17 Patrick McHardy : >> Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> Zdenek Kabelac a ?crit : >>>> [] nf_conntrack_ftp_fini+0x2f/0x70 [nf_conntrack_ftp] >>>> [] sys_delete_module+0x1a5/0x270 >>>> [] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13 >>>> [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x162/0x1b0 >>>> [] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x191/0x1c0 >>>> [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f >>>> [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >>>> Code: c6 00 00 0f 82 66 ff ff ff 49 8b 9e d8 05 00 00 48 85 db 75 16 >>>> e9 8e 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 85 c0 0f 84 80 00 00 00 48 89 c3 <0f> >>>> b6 4b 37 48 8b 03 48 8d 14 cd 00 00 00 00 0f 18 08 48 29 ca >>>> RIP [] nf_conntrack_helper_unregister+0x16c/0x320 >>>> [nf_conntrack] >>>> RSP >>>> CR2: 0000000000000038 >>>> ---[ end trace bc3a0ede3d0084db ]--- >>>> >>> I am currently traveling and wont be able to help you before next week. >>> >>> I added netdev, Patrick, and netfilter-devel in CC so that more eyes can take a look. >> Thanks for the report, I'll have a look at this. Zdenek, please >> send me the nf_conntrack.ko file used in the above oops. Thanks. >> > > Ok > > I've found the solution for my problem. > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel/30483 > > I've made this small fix from this thread: > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core > index b5869b9..68488f8 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c > @@ -1108,6 +1108,7 @@ static void nf_conntrack_cleanup_init_net(void) > { > nf_conntrack_helper_fini(); > nf_conntrack_proto_fini(); > + rcu_barrier(); > kmem_cache_destroy(nf_conntrack_cachep); > } > > @@ -1266,7 +1267,7 @@ static int nf_conntrack_init_init_net(void) > > nf_conntrack_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nf_conntrack", > sizeof(struct nf_conn), > - 0, SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, NULL); > + 0, 0, NULL); > if (!nf_conntrack_cachep) { > printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to create nf_conn slab cache\n"); > ret = -ENOMEM; > > > As the thread nf_conntrack: Use rcu_barrier() and fix kmem_cache_create flags > seems to be samewhat 'unfinished' and already a bit old and I've no > idea whether it actually fixes problem completely or just hides it in > my case - I'm leaving it to some RCU gurus to fix this issue. > > All I could say is - this this extra rcu_barrier() and removal of > SLAB_DESTROY removes my GPF on reboot. > > Zdenek Ouch.. Dont think such a patch makes your kernel better, it'll crash too. You cannot remove SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU like this, it's there for very good reasons. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/