Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:29:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:29:03 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:46341 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:28:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:26:50 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: "Richard B. Johnson" cc: John Heil , , Martin Wilck Subject: Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > Well I can see why he's an EX-Phoenix BIOS developer. A port at 0xed > does not exist on any standard or known non-standard Intel/PC/AT > compatible. Note that "doesn't exist" is actually a _bonus_. It means that no controller will answer to it, which causes the IO to time out, which on a regular ISA bus will also take the same 1us. Which is what we want. Real ports with real controllers can be faster - they could, for example, be fast motherboard PCI ports and be positively decoded and be faster than 1us. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/