Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932484AbZICW4K (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:56:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932472AbZICW4H (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:56:07 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f206.google.com ([209.85.219.206]:56685 "EHLO mail-ew0-f206.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932434AbZICW4F (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:56:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=om4ogMhIBBKiub9aPQ9dQ86TLsw8H7Hcbw3hwf3VPj3VzwCwxx8zN0s10q/oXhb4Ol hWhFfmZ87oqoxTkyauecQ2VjOHmvNneO3AMw9MFRwq29+x9T1INapRLJ6RLZRhVq5BUr l3Y1N25hTg6OI0po6vQKikPvMqo1B5exyz56c= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 04:56:01 +0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Question] x86,APIC: In apicdef.h dfr,svr,...... shouldn't be const? From: Rakib Mullick To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: LKML , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 693 Lines: 18 On 9/2/09, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > All the three have meaningful semantics on writes at least on some > versions of the APIC (they either have writable fields or trigger side > effects on writes). It looks like your documentation is wrong (not > unheard of with Intel). Thanks, Maciej. If my documentation is wrong, then which documentation should I follow? Isn't there any well defined document? > > > Maciej > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/