Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932855AbZIDQxu (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:53:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755294AbZIDQxt (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:53:49 -0400 Received: from ru.mvista.com ([213.79.90.228]:9378 "EHLO buildserver.ru.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755015AbZIDQxt (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:53:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:53:48 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Sam Ravnborg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] Makefile: Never use -fno-omit-frame-pointer Message-ID: <20090904165348.GA1287@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com References: <20090616201630.GA4971@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20090714133716.GC28970@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20090718120145.GB31007@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090718120145.GB31007@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1683 Lines: 47 On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 02:01:45PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:16:30AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > According to Segher Boessenkool and GCC manual, -fomit-frame-pointer > > > is only the default when optimising on archs/ABIs where it doesn't > > > hinder debugging and -pg. So, we do not get it by default on x86, > > > not at any optimisation level. > > > > > > On the other hand, *using* -fno-omit-frame-pointer causes gcc to > > > produce buggy code on PowerPC targets. > > > > > > If Segher and GCC manual are right, this patch should be a no-op > > > for all arches except PowerPC, where the patch fixes gcc issues. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov > > > --- > > > > > > See this thread for more discussion: > > > http://osdir.com/ml/linux-kernel/2009-05/msg01754.html > > > > > > p.s. > > > Obviously, I didn't test this patch on anything else but PPC32. ;-) > > > > > > Segher, do you know if all GCC versions that we support for > > > building Linux are behaving the way that GCC manual describe? > > > > No news is good news... Ingo, can we merge this into -tip for > > testing? > > Changes to the top level Makefile should really go via Sam's kbuild > tree. Sam, any thoughts about these patches? Thanks! -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/