Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 05:44:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 05:44:01 -0500 Received: from 167.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.167]:52490 "EHLO Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 05:43:42 -0500 Message-Id: <200203151040.g2FAeqq20797@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Denis Vlasenko Reply-To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua To: Alexander Viro , Brian Gerst Subject: Re: [PATCH] struct super_block cleanup - msdos/vfat Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:40:24 -0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Linux-Kernel In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13 March 2002 22:35, Alexander Viro wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Brian Gerst wrote: > > Seperates msdos_sb_info from struct super_block for msdos and vfat. > > Umsdos is terminally broken and is not included. > > We have everything needed to fix^Wrewrite umsdos and I hope to do that > this week. Main idea of the rewrite: turn it into proper layered > filesystem (i.e. let the underlying layer have its own superblock, > inodes, etc.)... Does this mean umsdos can be layered atop of wider range of filesystems than just msdos? That would be cool. Also, would it be possible to mount both underlying msdos fs and umsdos fs layered on top of it at the same time (on different mountpoints)? -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/