Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758199AbZIFW3W (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:29:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758125AbZIFW3W (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:29:22 -0400 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]:61333 "EHLO dan.rpsys.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755235AbZIFW3V (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:29:21 -0400 Subject: Re: Zaurus suspend saga From: Richard Purdie To: Pavel Machek Cc: lenz@cs.wisc.edu, kernel list , Dirk@Opfer-Online.de, arminlitzel@web.de, Cyril Hrubis , thommycheck@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel , dbaryshkov@gmail.com, omegamoon@gmail.com, eric.miao@marvell.com, utx@penguin.cz In-Reply-To: <20090906052653.GB1324@ucw.cz> References: <20090906052653.GB1324@ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:29:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1252276145.17852.15.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1582 Lines: 38 On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 07:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > fatal reads invalid values -- -108 -- probably because spi is not ready? > > is spi suspend/resume required? yes.; and yes spi is resumed too late > in the sequence. Or perhaps fatal battery check is way too early. > > Could someone confirm that simply removing sharpsl_fatal_check() fixes > zaurus suspend on 2.6.31? Sadly lack of time means I've lost track of the Zaurus kernels but this sounds like all accesses to the SSP buses now go through the SPI layer and when it was converted nobody thought about the impact this would have on the Zaurus charger code. If suspend/resume is broken in this way, it also means the charger code is also likely to be totally broken/malfunctioning since it won't be able to read from the ADC either. Either: a) Someone steps up and finds a way to partially resume the kernel so the "offline" charging code can work and access SPI b) We find some other way to allow the SPI interface to be accessed by the charger code without resuming the whole kernel (the way it used to work) c) We rip the whole thing out and stop supporting "offline" charging. I'd hate to see c) happen but I doubt I'm going to find time to rewrite that code any time soon and nobody else even seems to have grasped how deep this problem really is :(. Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/