Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 05:59:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 05:58:20 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:13840 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 05:58:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:57:56 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFT] simple deadline I/O scheduler Message-ID: <20020315105756.GC22169@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20020104094334.N8673@suse.de> <20020314073216.GB30351@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 14 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On March 14, 2002 08:32 am, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 13 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > Andrew Morton is also working in here, with a collection of ideas that I hope > > > are complementary if looked at the right way. See his '[patch] delayed disk > > > block allocation' post. > > > > Right, I noticed. We could get good write clustering in general with vm > > merging, though. > > Sorry, I can't parse that, do you mean 'if the elevator merging is merged with > vm's' or 'if vm does merging' or... ? Heh, guess it wasn't too clear. It was supposed to say 'if vm does the merging' or at least partially does it. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/