Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751395AbZIHOpT (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:45:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751164AbZIHOpS (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:45:18 -0400 Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:42996 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750722AbZIHOpS (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:45:18 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:45:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Con Kolivas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Mike Galbraith , Felix Fietkau References: <20090906205952.GA6516@elte.hu> <20090907182629.GA3484@elte.hu> <20090908074825.GA11413@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090908074825.GA11413@elte.hu> X-Move-Along: Nothing to see here. No, really... Nothing. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909081645.18505.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 646 Lines: 15 On Tuesday 08 September 2009 09:48:25 Ingo Molnar wrote: > Mind poking on this one to figure out whether it's all repeatable > and why that slowdown happens? I repeated the test several times, because I couldn't really believe that there's such a big difference for me, but the results were the same. I don't really know what's going on nor how to find out what's going on. -- Greetings, Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/