Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750985AbZIHQmL (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:42:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751050AbZIHQmK (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:42:10 -0400 Received: from mk-filter-1-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.100.52]:12967 "EHLO mk-filter-1-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750940AbZIHQmJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:42:09 -0400 X-Trace: 259558730/mk-filter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/79.69.112.247/None/hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 79.69.112.247 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-MUA: X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArMEAIMlpkpPRXD3/2dsb2JhbACBU91QhBgF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,353,1249254000"; d="scan'208";a="259558730" Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:40:50 +0100 (BST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@sister.anvils To: Nick Piggin cc: Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , KOSAKI Motohiro , Linus Torvalds , Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: reinstate ZERO_PAGE In-Reply-To: <20090908153441.GB29902@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20090908073119.GA29902@wotan.suse.de> <20090908153441.GB29902@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1291 Lines: 31 On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:17:01PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > By the way, in compiling that list of "special" architectures, > > I was surprised not to find ia64 amongst them. Not that it > > matters to me, but I thought the Fujitsu guys were usually > > keen on Itanium - do they realize that the special test is > > excluding it, or do they have their own special patch for it? > > I don't understand your question. Are you asking whether they > know your patch will not enable zero pages on ia64? That's what I was meaning to ask, yes; but wondering whether perhaps they've already got their own patch to enable pte_special on ia64, and just haven't got around to sending it in yet. > > I guess pte special was primarily driven by gup_fast, which in > turn was driven primarily by DB2 9.5, which I think might be > only available on x86 and ibm's architectures. > > But I admit to being a curious as to when I'll see a gup_fast > patch come out of SGI or HP or Fujitsu :) Yes, me too! Hugh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/