Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752062AbZIHThy (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:37:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751662AbZIHThy (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:37:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30372 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751994AbZIHThx (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:37:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:37:52 -0300 From: Glauber Costa To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] keep guest wallclock in sync with host clock Message-ID: <20090908193752.GH9013@mothafucka.localdomain> References: <1251902098-8660-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1251902098-8660-2-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <20090908184159.GC19318@amt.cnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090908184159.GC19318@amt.cnet> X-ChuckNorris: True User-Agent: Jack Bauer Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1423 Lines: 29 On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:41:59PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:34:57AM -0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > > KVM clock is great to avoid drifting in guest VMs running ontop of kvm. > > However, the current mechanism will not propagate changes in wallclock value > > upwards. This effectively means that in a large pool of VMs that need accurate timing, > > all of them has to run NTP, instead of just the host doing it. > > > > Since the host updates information in the shared memory area upon msr writes, > > this patch introduces a worker that writes to that msr, and calls do_settimeofday > > at fixed intervals, with second resolution. A interval of 0 determines that we > > are not interested in this behaviour. A later patch will make this optional at > > runtime > > > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa > > As mentioned before, ntp already does this (and its not that heavy is > it?). > > For example, if ntp running on the host, it avoids stepping the clock > backwards by slow adjustment, while the periodic frequency adjustment on > the guest bypasses that. Simple question: How do I run ntp in guests without network? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/