Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752241AbZIHV26 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:28:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751585AbZIHV25 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:28:57 -0400 Received: from mail-in-16.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.56]:59173 "EHLO mail-in-16.arcor-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751168AbZIHV25 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:28:57 -0400 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-14.arcor-online.net 4C03A28ACC3 Message-ID: <4AA6CC99.6010701@arcor.de> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:28:57 +0300 From: Nikos Chantziaras Organization: Lucas Barks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090826 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Theodore Tso , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements References: <20090906205952.GA6516@elte.hu> <20090907074039.1b6bc1ac@infradead.org> <4AA6056A.4020106@arcor.de> <20090908013800.296a5fb5@infradead.org> <4AA62E4E.4040700@arcor.de> <20090908120311.GK22901@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090908120311.GK22901@mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1381 Lines: 31 On 09/08/2009 03:03 PM, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:13:34PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> despite the untranslated content, it is clear that you have scheduler >>> delays (either due to scheduler bugs or cpu contention) of upto 68 >>> msecs... Second in line is your binary AMD graphics driver that is >>> chewing up 14% of your total latency... >> >> I've now used a correctly installed and up-to-date version of latencytop >> and repeated the test. Also, I got rid of AMD's binary blob and used >> kernel DRM drivers for my graphics card to throw fglrx out of the >> equation (which btw didn't help; the exact same problems occur). >> >> Here the result: >> >> http://foss.math.aegean.gr/~realnc/pics/latop2.png > > This was with an unmodified 2.6.31-rcX kernel? Yes (-rc9). I also tested with 2.6.30.5 and getting the same results. > Does Latencytop do anything useful on a BFS-patched kernel? Nope. BFS does not support any form of tracing yet. latencytop runs but only shows a blank list. All I can say is that a BFS patched kernel with the same .config fixes all visible latency issues. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/