Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752442AbZIHWLi (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:11:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752159AbZIHWLh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:11:37 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-310.bluehost.com ([67.222.54.3]:43214 "HELO outbound-mail-310.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752039AbZIHWLg (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:11:36 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=LgxqubHXrfbA3LfKsJcDbarPjmVQjh6iX4/+Y71L2SaU9m5mKdSprpa/Ng2gXNA6ChHF2StDclTaVp8ggvcPt8nEIsla6zl0UOap3sOf3hz3EF1P8hWd2wAgpDaIYrsZ; Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:11:35 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes To: Linus Torvalds Cc: reinette chatre , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Eric Anholt , "Ma, Ling" , "bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console Message-ID: <20090908151135.7ba64801@jbarnes-g45> In-Reply-To: References: <2ehA7xoGvXL.A.4PB.3eBpKB@chimera> <1252427375.14735.130.camel@rc-desk> <1252431375.14735.139.camel@rc-desk> <20090908112014.002a35af@jbarnes-g45> <20090908123151.1f2b18fe@jbarnes-g45> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.17.5; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.28.251 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1712 Lines: 43 On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > Yeah, saw that. I don't think that's the root cause though. If we > > see a user interrupt after gem_idle is called we may have serious > > issues in our command handling code. > > Quite frankly, I do not understand why you seem to be making excuses > for code that causes a very nasty and undebuggable oops, causing the > machine to die. No excuses. This is a serious bug; I just don't want to paper over it. > This regression is almost two months old, and apparently the Intel > graphics people DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about it during those two > months, because they couldn't be bothered to look at it. Yeah sorry, this is the first I've seen of it... I usually troll the regressions lists but I must have missed this one. > And now, when I pinpointed exactly where the oops happens, and what > the cause is, you seem to be trying to hold things up. I wanted to do > the final 2.6.31 release yesterday, quite frankly I'm not in the > _least_ interested in excuses, I'm interested in something that at > least gets us back to the 2.6.30 state that doesn't oops! > > Get me a patch, please. If disabling the interrupts early won't work, > get me something else. Stop delaying it - it's been pending for 48 > days already. Sure, looking at it now. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/