Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 23:32:37 -0400
From: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
Cc: ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
       netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       lrodriguez@atheros.com, mickflemm@gmail.com, jirislaby@gmail.com,
       linville@tuxdriver.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k: do not free irq after resume when card has been
	removed
Message-ID: <20090909033237.GC13550@hash.localnet>
References: <1252457551-4909-1-git-send-email-cascardo@holoscopio.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1252457551-4909-1-git-send-email-cascardo@holoscopio.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 778
Lines: 20

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:52:31PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> ath5k will try to request irq when resuming and fails if the device
> (like a PCMCIA card) has been removed.

That's not true, ath5k no longer requests an irq when resuming.

> This solves this issue defining a new flag for the status bitmap to
> indicate when irq has been successfully requested and does not try to
> release it if not.

I'd rather not fix it with a status bit.  What kernel is this against?

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/