Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:06:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:05:53 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:12872 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:05:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:05:21 -0500 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Keith Owens Cc: Pete Zaitcev , linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch to fix s390 cross-compilation in 2.4.18 Message-ID: <20020315120521.A4262@devserv.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20020311022529.A29248@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <28920.1015834086@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <28920.1015834086@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>; from kaos@ocs.com.au on Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 07:08:06PM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > From: Keith Owens > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 19:08:06 +1100 > >The s390 cannot be cross-compiled, because necessary -I is missing > >from gcc flags of assembler modules. Also I straightened flags up > >a little bit (removed duplicated -D__ASSEMBLY__). > > Looks good. Could you try without -traditional? I want to know if > that flag is really required or not. It is required, because without it cpp blows up on assembler comments with special characters in them. Martin, did you apply the patch? -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/