Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 03:07:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 03:07:40 -0500 Received: from mgw-x3.nokia.com ([131.228.20.26]:48051 "EHLO mgw-x3.nokia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 03:07:25 -0500 Message-ID: <9524EA4E18D6D2119FEA0008C7C5A006BE4A77@lneis01nok> From: Peter.Ronnquist@nokia.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: shared memory, mmap not recommended? Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:36:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.78) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, In a recent posting Linus Torvalds mentioned (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=97598683318724&w=2) : > (otherwise I'll just end up disabling shared mmap - I doubt anybody really uses it anyway, but it would be more polite to just support it). I was thinking about using mmap for shared mememory in my program, but now I am reconsidering. Is the System V or Posix mechanism for shared memory a better(it will be supported in 2.4) choice? (I am not subscribed to the mailing list so please CC your eventual reply) BR Peter R?nnquist Software Engineer Nokia Home Communications email: peter.ronnquist@nokia.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/