Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:08:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:08:28 -0500 Received: from Expansa.sns.it ([192.167.206.189]:22533 "EHLO Expansa.sns.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:08:11 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 19:07:57 +0100 (CET) From: Luigi Genoni To: Alan Cox cc: Thunder from the hill , , Martin Eriksson Subject: Re: HPT370 RAID-1 or Software RAID-1, what's "best"? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > Hardware RAID is indeed better, but what you get using HPT370 IDE > > controlelr is not hardware raid at all. Just read the code of the driver. > > You get a software raid, period. > > Its not always that simple either. > > Software raid on aic7xxx totally blows away the Dell/AMI megaraid card I > have, to the point the megaraid now resides in my testing bucket. The promise > Supertrak 100 (now superceded by the SX6000) is also slower than the > software IDE raid, but does use less CPU in RAID5 mode. yes, I know, but I was talking "generaliter" > > Some hardware raid cards do seem to be winners. The Dell Perc2/QC aacraid > based boards (233Mhz ARM etc) really shift. When I've had the chance to > borrow the disks to test I've seen it running over 100Mbytes/second. It > also supports nice stuff like online reconfiguration of active volumes. > [$$stupid from Dell $$notalot from ebay ;)] On my CISS Compaq array I get quite similar performances ;) Luigi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/