Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754138AbZIJENv (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:13:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754107AbZIJENu (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:13:50 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:40767 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751231AbZIJENs (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:13:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:13:20 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: LKML , Kay Sievers , Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] char/tty_io: fix legacy pty name when more than 256 pty devices are requested Message-ID: <20090910011320.3a6ec797@caramujo.chehab.org> In-Reply-To: <4AA73309.8030302@zytor.com> References: <20090908144942.76ddf0e7@caramujo.chehab.org> <4AA6DF50.3030603@zytor.com> <20090908203323.486c129c@caramujo.chehab.org> <4AA6F63F.7090009@zytor.com> <20090908235441.04549a29@caramujo.chehab.org> <4AA73309.8030302@zytor.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.4; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1201 Lines: 29 Em Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:46:01 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" escreveu: > Actually it's [7:4][*:8][3:0]. It was the easiest way to get backwards > compatibility, since it allowed for the use of s[n]printf(). It's not > by any means the only possibility, but I think the easiest one to describe. > > > From one side, I liked the idea of not having any arbitrary maximum limit, but > > from other side, It seems easier to implement than to describe it in English, > > at devices.txt. Maybe the solution is to explain it by examples. > > > > Also, if we look at the current device designation, we already have some rule > > changes. > > That doesn't mean it's a good idea. True. Given the idea of using an unique algorithm to populate the namespace, I agree that your proposal is a good alternative. I just sent the patch with the feedbacks I had. I tried to do my best to describe it in simple yet precise terms at devices.txt. Thanks, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/