Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:50:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:49:59 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:42511 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:49:55 -0500 Subject: Re: bug (trouble?) report on high mem support To: john.helms@photomask.com (John Helms) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 20:05:39 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim.Trice@photomask.com (Trice Jim) In-Reply-To: <20020315.19251700@linux.local> from "John Helms" at Mar 15, 2002 07:25:17 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > running under the 2.4.7-10 enterprise > kernel. This same program runs fine > under the 2.4.7-10 smp kernel. The main Firstly queue standard comment about 2.4.9 errata kernels and upgrading > difference is that in a top output, most > of the cpu time is in system mode and very > little user mode under the enterprise kernel, > and just the opposite under the smp kernel. When you are using large amounts of RAM things in the PC world get a bit messy. Is this a box with a lot of memory ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/