Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:42:52 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, stable@kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] agp/intel: remove restore in resume
Message-Id: <20090910134252.5fc54ce2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <1252028615-13785-1-git-send-email-zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
References: <1252028615-13785-1-git-send-email-zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 909
Lines: 22

On Fri,  4 Sep 2009 09:43:34 +0800
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> As early pci resume has already restored config for host
> bridge and graphics device, don't need to restore it again,
> which might cause problem on some chips, like 845G tested by
> Alan Stern.
> 
> Cc: Stable Team <stable@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>

Why were these patches cc'ed to stable@kernel.org?  There's nothing in
the changelog which explains why the problem which is being fixed is
sufficiently serious to warrant backporting the patch.

Was there a [patch 3/3]?  I didn't receive it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/