Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 18:35:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 18:34:57 -0500 Received: from 12-224-37-81.client.attbi.com ([12.224.37.81]:518 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 18:34:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:34:42 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Gordon J Lee Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IBM x360 2.2.x boot failure, 2.4.9 works fine Message-ID: <20020315233441.GG5563@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <3C927F3E.7C7FB075@world.std.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C927F3E.7C7FB075@world.std.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.20 (i586) Reply-By: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 19:01:14 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:09:50PM -0500, Gordon J Lee wrote: > IBM has a brand new xSeries PC server called the x360. > It has 1-4 Xeon MP's, DDR SDRAM, PCI-X backplane, IBM Summit chipset. > Full specs are here: > > http://www.pc.ibm.com/us/eserver/xseries/x360.html Eeek, these machines are now in the wild? Didn't realize this :) > Has anyone tried running Linux on one of these ? Yes. > I have tried a few versions and found: > > 2.2.18 fails in boot > 2.2.20 fails in boot > 2.2.21rc2 fails in boot Ouch :( > 2.4.9 works fine! Glad to see this. > I know the hardware is in good shape because a 2.4.9 kernel works > fine on this machine. I have scoured the IBM site, linux-kernel, > and Google for clues, but to no avail. > > The boot sequence failure under the 2.2.x versions that I tried is > always the same, it fails to recognize the IDE and SCSI devices. From > the messages, the system appears to be deaf to interrupts and so it > cannot recognize its devices. Notable messages from the boot sequence > that support this idea are: I don't know if anyone ever tried a 2.2.x kernel on these boxes :) Is there a reason you _really_ need a 2.2.x kernel for this machine? You also might try a UP 2.2.x kernel on this box to see if the problem is in the parsing of the APIC tables (as I think it is.) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/