Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754484AbZIMOiK (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:38:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754378AbZIMOiH (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:38:07 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:52518 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754372AbZIMOiG (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:38:06 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Subject: Re: [RFC][v6][PATCH 0/9] clone_with_pids() syscall Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:36:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.31-9-generic; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oren Laadan , "Eric W. Biederman" , Alexey Dobriyan , Pavel Emelyanov , Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mikew@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, Nathan Lynch , container@us.ibm.com, sukadev@us.ibm.com References: <20090910060627.GA24343@us.ibm.com> <1252688404.7126.40.camel@laptop> <20090912171930.GB29169@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20090912171930.GB29169@us.ibm.com> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]> =?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909131636.47407.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+byQMfXFEO8JPuEJ7lnV3aH5kyrlXujUvrNYs dRCdQUsEURnhPOnSMWd4YRZ/bRtKmb/vWYu3Xw0uSP2x1QHJUM ZyL98/puFPYyrUu9qqtBQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1031 Lines: 26 On Saturday 12 September 2009, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > Peter Zijlstra [peterz@infradead.org] wrote: > | On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 09:47 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > | > | Also, if you're passing a struct, why not put nr_pids in there, and > | > | replace clone_pid_struct with a simple array? That would give us > | > | > | > | struct clone_struct { > | > | u64 flags; > | > | u64 child_stack; > | > | u32 child_tid; > | > | u32 parent_tid; > > BTW, these two tids are __user pointers that kernel copies data into. > They should be u64 to avoid conversions in architecture specific code ? > No, they are not pointers, the kernel can directly write into the user data structure. Indirect pointers would not be helpful here IMHO. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/