Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754616AbZIMPd1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:33:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753294AbZIMPdW (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:33:22 -0400 Received: from mba.ocn.ne.jp ([122.28.14.163]:52695 "EHLO smtp.mba.ocn.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751164AbZIMPdW (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:33:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:33:21 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20090914.003321.160496287.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> To: julia@diku.dk Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] arch/mips/txx9: introduce missing kfree, iounmap From: Atsushi Nemoto In-Reply-To: References: <20090913.232548.253168283.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> X-Fingerprint: 6ACA 1623 39BD 9A94 9B1A B746 CA77 FE94 2874 D52F X-Pgp-Public-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2874D52F X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1540 Lines: 37 On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:14:06 +0200 (CEST), Julia Lawall wrote: > > This patch add some correctness, but obviously incomplete: there are > > more error pathes without iounmap/kfree/etc. in this function. > > The only other error path that I see is: > > pdev = platform_device_alloc("leds-gpio", basenum); > if (!pdev) > return; > > But at that point the call gpiochip_add(&iocled->chip) has already > succeeded. From looking at this function, I have the impression that it > makes the iocled structure available from a global array, gpio_desc. > Since the function containing the above code doesn't return any error > code, perhaps the caller will not know whether this platform_device_alloc > error occurred or not. There would also be at least the problem of > getting the pointer out of the gpio_desc structure. I guess this could be > done with gpiochip_remove? > > I can certainly make a new patch using the goto style, but let me know > what to do about the above issue. Yes, this gpiochip is only used by leds-gpio driver. So gpiochip_remove() would be the right thing to do when something failed. Also there is one another error path: platform_device_add() failure at the end of this function. Thanks. --- Atsushi Nemoto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/