Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755514AbZINRrR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:47:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751242AbZINRrO (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:47:14 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f206.google.com ([209.85.219.206]:59054 "EHLO mail-ew0-f206.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751063AbZINRrN (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:47:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=Km3TOJ2ghNm+3lK/s09Ip8qNEhMSI0NddtWRWbEd5aUgAu9Y9sDPWrD4GgAZZIc/Z9 jmAXri+i3P3gX4WY1UZxQ+JNzZIZ6RE/8eY49aX5WHXM/JPkmiVcjgoiCB55mz26TcDw McIxwJ1RbJrGATtrDDqXG9LRFOK6mcldU2xyI= From: Corentin Chary To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] rfkill_unregister() should always be followed by rfkill_destroy() Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:47:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.31-gentoo; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Alan Jenkins , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel" , Julia Lawall , Johannes Berg References: <1252925033-29696-1-git-send-email-corentincj@iksaif.net> <20090914170717.GA13452@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20090914171056.GB13452@khazad-dum.debian.net> In-Reply-To: <20090914171056.GB13452@khazad-dum.debian.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909141947.22170.corentincj@iksaif.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 902 Lines: 23 On Monday 14 September 2009 19:10:56 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > I don't know about the fix for dell-laptop since it is a lot larger. > > But looking at it, it seems to meet the -stable criteria as well. However, > it looks like you're fixing two bugs there (set pointers to NULL, call > _destroy()), so it would be better to have two (smaller) patches, maybe? > The dell-laptop patch is superseded by: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/42705/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/42699/ I didn't check patchwork before working on this patch :/ -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/